![]() Moreover, the reasoning of the bare majority of the Court was in strong opposition to the parallel jurisprudential developments in the European system of human rights protection, as epitomized by the decision of the European Commission of Human Rights in the Pfunders case of 1960 ( Austria v Italy, 1961, see sec B.4(a) below). As is well known, the decision by which the Court denied any legal interest on the part of Ethiopia and Liberia to sue South Africa for its policy of apartheid in Namibia was taken by the casting vote of the President. One may wonder whether the ICJ’s position truly reflected the state of international law at the time. ![]() Middle Eastern Organizations/Institutionsĥ In general terms, as will be later shown, in its 1966 judgment on the South West Africa case, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) gave short shrift to the very idea of actio popularis in international law (see sec B.1(a) below).Use of force, war, peace and neutrality.Statehood, jurisdiction of states, organs of states. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |